camus – the plague

the plague

I finished reading this a couple of days ago. It was the second time I’ve read it, the first time being maybe four years ago? I recall liking this book a lot the first time I read it. The second time, it seemed to drag on, not really having anything driving the plot, and the characters seemed unrealistic to me. I think this is generally true of Camus novels- his characters mostly exist so that Camus can express his beliefs about human nature, rather than tell a compelling story. I suspect the first time I read this book, I was taken by Camus’ humanist philosophy, which I still find interesting. This time, though, I was more conscious of the novel’s failings as a story, rather than the underlying philosophy. I’m reading “The Fall”, also by Camus, now. It seems to be quite a bit shorter than “The Plague”, so it will be a quick read, and I can compare the two books.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

The story of a doctor who conquered his own insanity and now shows others the way back, by the author of Microbe Hunters.
"An old master Paul de Kruif surely is. His latest book has pace, it has style, it has a sharply drawn hero, and, most important, it tells one of the great stories of our times." -Washington Post and Times Herald.

I found that in the back of a copy of Nova Express by William S. Burroughs.

My name is Alex and I live in LA the Bay Area.

Blog Stats

  • 84,493 hits

%d bloggers like this: